The Average Age of Codebases

Photo by RetroSupply on Unsplash

The Average Age of Codebases

Is Your Code a Baby or a Boomer?

Have you ever stopped to wonder just how old some codebases really are? Like, really think about it? As a recent graduate, I haven’t worked on a company's legacy system yet, but I’ve heard the horror stories. While exploring open-source projects and learning from older repositories, I once stumbled upon a comment that referenced Netscape Navigator. I had to pause and Google it because… what even is Netscape Navigator? Turns out, it was a browser that peaked in the 1990s—before I was even writing “Hello, World!” programs.

This got me thinking: How old are most codebases out there? Are we all just patching up relics from another era? And more importantly, do older codebases mean wiser codebases—or just more headaches for developers like me?

Let’s take a closer look at the average age of codebases, why it matters, and what it says about the industry as a whole.

》How Old Is "Old"?

In the world of software, anything over five years feels ancient. But the truth is, the average age of a codebase is 13 to 20 years. Yup, the software you're using to buy coffee online or scroll endlessly on social media might be running on code written when Britney Spears first sang Oops!... I Did It Again.

But here's the kicker: a lot of this old code still works. In fact, some of the most critical systems we rely on every day—banking systems, air traffic control, government databases—are running on codebases that are older than most junior developers. COBOL (yes, it’s back again) is a perfect example. That stuff has been chugging along since the '60s, like your grandpa’s vintage car that somehow refuses to die.

》Why Do Old Codebases Stick Around?

You’d think companies would jump at the chance to replace these aging codebases with something newer, flashier, and easier to maintain. But no. Here’s why:

1. “If It Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix It”

Companies are like, “Why spend millions rewriting code when it’s still doing its job?” Sure, it’s held together by duct tape and prayer, but hey, it works.

2. Legacy Dependencies

Old codebases often rely on frameworks, libraries, or technologies that are no longer supported. Changing even one piece could break the whole thing, like pulling the wrong block in a game of Jenga.

3. Documentation? What Documentation?

Nobody knows how it all works anymore. The person who wrote the code left the company 10 years ago, and their only documentation is a single comment that says, “TODO: Fix this someday.”

4. Developers Love a Challenge

Let’s be honest: there’s a weird sense of pride in keeping a 20-year-old codebase alive. It’s like being a code archaeologist.

》Fun (and Slightly Scary) Facts About Old Code

NASA’s Voyager 1 Probe is powered by 1970s code. It’s so old that the programmers who wrote it had to come out of retirement to help fix bugs when updates were needed. Talk about job security.

Windows XP might be officially dead, but pieces of its codebase are still alive in newer Windows versions. Like a zombie that just won’t quit.

The “Oldest Running Software” award might go to the U.S. nuclear arsenal systems, some of which still rely on 8-inch floppy disks. If you’re under 30 and don’t know what a floppy disk is, just imagine a very sad USB drive.

》What’s It Like Working on an Old Codebase?

If you’ve ever worked on an old codebase, you know the struggle:

• It’s Full of Surprises

Ever touched one line of code and caused a cascade of bugs in completely unrelated parts of the system? Welcome to legacy code.

• You’re Playing Detective

Half your time is spent trying to figure out what the code does and why it’s written the way it is. The other half is spent screaming, “Why would anyone do it this way?!”

• Refactoring Is a No-Go

Sure, you could rewrite that messy function, but what if it breaks something in production? Better to just leave it alone and hope for the best.

》Final Thoughts: Aging Gracefully

So, is an old codebase a curse or a blessing? Honestly, it’s a little of both. On one hand, working with legacy code can be frustrating and make you question your career choices. On the other hand, it’s a reminder of how far we’ve come as an industry—and how much our work can endure.

As for me, I’ve come to accept that old codebases are like family heirlooms. They may not be perfect, but they’ve stood the test of time, and there’s a certain beauty in that.

And now, if you’ll excuse me, I need to go dive into more coding challenges to sharpen my skills. But when I do write my own code that survives for decades (fingers crossed🤞), I’ll make sure to leave a helpful comment for future developers:

// Good luck. You’re definitely going to need it😎.